Thoughts & Comments
Two Cheers for First Niagara
The board did the right thing in tossing out its CEO. Now it needs to find a worthwhile replacement. Here are three suggestions.

Thomas Brown  ( about me )
Posted 03/20/2013

Speaking strictly as a matter of self-interest, I’m disappointed First Niagara’s board has given the heave-ho to its CEO John Koelmel. Koelmel was shaping up to be a 21st-century version of the legendary Hugh McColl: a blindly ambitious bank CEO willing to dilute his shareholders again and again, via one deal after another, in pursuit of his own dreams of banking empire. McColl’s shareholders may have been abused along the way during his dealmaking frenzy two decades ago, but those deals did wonders for bank-stock valuations generally. As an investor in bank stocks (but not in serial diluters), I’m in favor of that--and was hoping Koelmel’s ambitions would do for bank-buyout fever in coming years what McColl did for it in the 1990s. It’s hard to believe now, but transactions at 5 times book back then weren’t uncommon. Ah, those were the days.  

So as I say, part of me is disappointed. On the other hand, First Niagara’s board did absolutely the right thing in shutting down Koelmel’s growth-via-acquisition-no-matter-the-price strategy. Rollups via stock deals are almost always doomed to fail. The “growth” they create depends entirely on a premium-priced stock that can be used as a currency. But as the deals become bigger and bigger (as they must), that premium becomes harder to sustain. When it finally collapses, shareholder pain can be brutal. First Niagara holders have begun to endure some of that pain, and the board was absolutely right to act to alleviate it. Based on the market’s early reaction, relief is on the way.

 In the meantime, First Niagara has a strong franchise in some attractive and highly underrated markets. The right CEO there has an opportunity to add real value. In case the board is open to suggestions as to whom it might consider—and it should be--allow me to suggest the following three individuals. Each is a great candidate:

  • Al de Molina, most recently CFO of Bank of America, has had a long and successful career in banking and is one of the smartest and most capable bankers I know. He would be a great CEO.
  • Cathy Nash engineered one of the most impressive post-crunch credit turnarounds so far when she brought Citizens Republic back from the brink and engineered its sale to First Merit. She is a proven moneymaker.
  • Brad Warner ran the retail operation at the old Fleet/Bank of Boston and understands the banking industry inside out. He has a solid record of success at whatever he’s done.  

Any of these individuals would do a great job leading First Niagara. In the meantime, if it makes the right choice, the board has a solid opportunity to do the right thing for shareholders.

What do you think? Let me know!

  Add your comment



sti Posted On 3/20/2013 12:08:01 PM

If they want to sell a mess to someone else...Nash is the pick.

Adam Posted On 3/20/2013 2:00:25 PM

Al de Molina was most recently CEO of GMAC from April 2008 to November 2009. He came in after the damage was done but took the fall for the previous regime.

Sam.  Posted On 3/20/2013 2:09:08 PM

Hooray! I've owned FNFG for the apst two years and I've been waiting for something good to happen. Good riddance to bad rubbish!

Adam Posted On 3/20/2013 2:44:25 PM

Al de Molina was most recently CEO of GMAC from April 2008 to November 2009. He came in after the damage was done but took the fall for the previous regime.

Capemayacme Posted On 3/20/2013 3:30:28 PM

Tony T.

Jim W Posted On 3/22/2013 9:14:42 AM

Looks like someone at American Banker read this post..

Ken Lewis Posted On 3/22/2013 11:21:05 PM

I need a job too, can I get a plug?

Ken Lewis Posted On 3/23/2013 8:20:39 AM

I need a job too, can I get a plug?
Ad for inter-arch
Ad for Bankstocks is a public web site operated by individuals who also operate investment advisory firms that serve as investment advisers to hedge funds (the "Firms"). Some articles are authored by employees of the Firms while others are authored by third parties. Under no circumstances does any article posted on represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. This article is intended to provide insight into the financial services industry and is not a solicitation of any kind. The Firms do not vouch for the accuracy of any information contained in any article posted herein and the views expressed in any article herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Firms. The Firms buy and sell securities on behalf of their fund investors and may do so, before and after any particular article herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article posted herein. The Firms’ appraisal of a company's prospects is only one factor that affects the Firms’ decision whether to buy or sell shares in that company. Other factors might include, but are not limited to, the presence of mandatory limits on individual positions, decisions regarding portfolio exposures, and general market conditions, and liquidity needs. As such, there may not always be consistency between the views expressed in this article and the Firms’ trading on behalf of their fund investors. There may be conflicts between the content posted on and the interests of the Firms. For an explanation of these conflicts, including an explanation of our trading policy, and how we resolve them, click here.

Neither the authors nor any team members can provide investment advice or respond to individual requests for recommendations. However, we encourage your feedback and welcome your comments on any of the articles on this site. Neither the authors nor has undertaken any responsibility to update any portion of this article in response to events which may transpire subsequent to its original publication date.