﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Thoughts &amp; Comments And Quick Takes</title><link>www.bankstocks.com</link><item><title>The Credit Recovery at Taylor Capital Continues</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6178&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6178&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;A return to profitability likely this year. After that, meaningful long-term earnings growth&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>Why Is OneUnited Bank Still With Us?</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6170&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6170&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;By the look of its balance sheet, Maxine Waters' favorite lender should have been put down by regulators long ago&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>Higher Required Capital Won't Crimp Bank Lending?</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6169&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6169&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;That's what a handful of studies want you to believe. Don't buy it.&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>The More We Read About Dodd-Frank, The Less We Like It</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6157&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6157&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;And we didn't like it much to begin with. Have you heard about "qualified martgages"?&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>A Bankstocks.com Classic: How To Reform The Financial System </title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6156&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6156&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Our nine-point proposal&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>The Dodd-Frank Bill: What People Are Saying</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6151&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6151&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;And why most of them are wrong, wrong, wrong&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>What's Wrong With The Financial Reform Bill?</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6139&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6139&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Everything. &lt;i&gt;The Wall Street Journal&lt;/i&gt; counts the ways&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>Don’t Agree With My Negative Take On The Dodd-Frank Bill?</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6138&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6138&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Well then, at least hear what Dick Bove has to say&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>The FDIC Devises A Revolutionary New Consumer Finance Product!</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6137&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6137&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;There’s just one little problem. . . . &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>This Just In From Meredith-Land</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6136&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6136&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;On CNBC, a glimpse of an alternate reality&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>The Stock Could Nearly Double!--But We're Neutral</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6135&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6135&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;More fuzzy investment logic from the sell-side&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>Rip Van Whitney</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6134&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6134&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Our girl Meredith, bearish as ever, seems to have snoozed through the past twelve months &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>Retroactive Nonsense</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6133&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6133&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Congress is set to push back the effective date of its increase in the FDIC's insurance limit. That's a terrible idea. &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>The Bank Blitz Memo: Honestly Speaking</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6131&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6131&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Better customer relationships are a matter of trust.&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>The Worst Thing Of All About The Financial Reform Bill</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6130&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6130&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;It's not the CFPA, it's not the Volcker Rule, its not . . . &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>Still Bullish On Synovus</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6129&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6129&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;The company's recent offering severely limits risk, but also some potential upside. Why we're still positive.&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>Al Franken's Amendment Won't Fix What's The Matter With The Rating Agencies </title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6127&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6127&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Instead, it's shaping up to be a non-solution to what's turned into a non-problem&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>Nouriel Roubini: Still Wrong</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6124&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6124&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;From macroeconomic visionary to reflexive crank&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>A Bad-News Bailout </title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6123&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6123&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;The deal to save ShoreBank is Chicago-style politics-as-usual &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>Same Old Wells Fargo </title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6121&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6121&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;At its first analyst day in 12 years, the company shows its winning culture is intact&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>If The Government Can't Even Accurately Estimate The Cost Of Failed Banks . . . .</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6118&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6118&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;. . . how much faith should be have in its long-term projected price tags of the really big-ticket programs? &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>A Republican Takeover Of The House This Fall?</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6116&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6116&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Not just a possibility--it's a probability&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>The Bank Blitz Memo: Do Your Bidding</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6115&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6115&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;What value would customers place on their experiences with you?  &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>"Consumer Protection" In Financial Services? Good Luck With That</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6110&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6110&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;The FDIC is already trying. It's not pretty. &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>A Bankstocks.com Classic: Why The Proposed Consumer Protection Agency Is A Terrible Idea</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6107&amp;ArticleTypeID=2</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=6107&amp;ArticleTypeID=2' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;It will raise the cost of consumer credit and make it more scarce, and weaken the financial system, as well&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Thoughts &amp; Comments</category></item><item><title>BOY OH BOY IS BILL MILLER EVER BULLISH</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6181</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6181' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Bill Miller, writing in the FT: 

Long-term Treasuries . . . have beaten equities as measured by the S&amp;P 500 in the year to date, and in the 3-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year time frames. It’s a tie at 25 years. More than 20 years of superior returns over stocks in an asset 
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>BLOGGER: BANKS OPPOSE HONEST FINANCIAL REPORTING. REALLY?</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6180</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6180' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Michael Shedlock writes: 

Virtually all the banks are against honest reporting. Wells Fargo is leading the pack because of all the nonperforming Pay Option ARM and 
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>BERKOWITZ: BANKS' BALANCE SHEETS 'STRONGER THAN EVER'</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6179</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6179' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Bruce Berkowitz, discussing his outlook for the financials, makes a lot of sense: 


And, for the last couple of years, companies have gone through tremendous stress, the financials. But today, their balance sheets are stronger than ever, their earnings power, their pre-tax, pre-provisioning power is stronger than 
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>ANALYST: OBAMA SCAPEGOATING OF FINANCIALS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN SMARTEST MOVE IN THE WORLD</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6177</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6177' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Jason Schwarz is not happy with how President Obama has treated the banks:  

Obama thought that he didn’t need the bankers, he thought that the cyclical recovery would be strong enough to overcome all
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>ANGELO MOZILO, PUNCTILIOUS UNDERWRITER</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6176</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6176' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Gretchen Morgenson is going to love this. 

Mozilo approved so many loans that fell outside company guidelines that at least one high-ranking Countrywide executive questioned them, drawing heated responses from Mozilo, according to testimony filed in a Securities and Exchange
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>RISING FAILURES A SIGN THAT WORST NOT OVER FOR BANKS? PLEASE.</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6175</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6175' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Tony Abbate writes that “for banks, the worst is probably yet to come” because 1) bank failures are still rising, and 2) ARM resets are set to increase next year. Am not convinced. . . . First, bank failures are a lagging indicator of industry health. (By definition, they’re the laggingest lagging indicator, right? What comes after?) As for ARM resets, &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>VOLATILITY? NO, WE CAN'T HAVE ANY OF THAT</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6174</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6174' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;SunTrust buys back $750 million of its debt. From TheStreet.com:

 "There are two primary benefits for SunTrust - reducing our funding cost and reducing future income statement volatility," a 
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>LET'S JUST SAY MILBURN DRYSDALE PROBABLY WASN'T HIS ROLE MODEL</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6173</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6173' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;The more one learns about Kevin Cohee, CEO of OneUnited Bank, the more wonders how in blazes he’s been given the keys to an FDIC-insured depository: 

&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>WELLS PARTS AT LAST WITH ONE OF ITS SWANKIEST OREO</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6172</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6172' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Remember Cheronda Guyton? She’s the former Wells Fargo executive who got herself fired last year for hosting parties at a lavish Malibu &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>ROSS: STICKING IT TO LOCAL CONSUMERS IS A BRILLIANT INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6171</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6171' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Wilbur Ross talks to Charlie Rose about the outlook for manufacturing in the U.S. 

What I'm worried about is R&amp;D. You have to have new technologies. We think of China as a polluter. Let me tell you, China is 
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>WHOOPS! &lt;I&gt;FORTUNE&lt;/I&gt;'S BENNER MAKES CASE AGAINST ELIZABETH WARREN WITHOUT MEANING TO</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6168</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6168' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Fortune’s Katie Benner makes the least convincing case yet for Elizabeth Warren to head the CFPB:   


Someone like Warren is a shock to that system. She unabashedly sides with consumers. She hates fine print and contracts with "gotcha" clauses. She wants to eliminate predatory loans. And she thinks that it's okay for bank profits
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>POST-DEAL, MOODY'S TAKES ITS OWN SWEET TIME CONFIRMING SYNOVUS' RATING</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6167</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6167' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Will the rating agencies ever miss an opportunity to demonstrate how clueless they are? Doubtful! From Reuters, yesterday:


Moody's confirms Synovus 
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>NEWS FLASH! GOLDMAN CEO NOT UNIVERSALLY VILIFIED</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6166</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6166' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Ninety-seven percent of Goldman employees approve of the job Lloyd Blankfein is doing. All things considered, I can’t say as I blame them. . . . &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>TOO WELL-CONNECTED TO FAIL</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6165</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6165' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;ShoreBank, the bank that will not die:

ShoreBank’s capital deficiency worsened in the second quarter, according to newly submitted financial results to regulators
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>THIS JUST IN FROM DEPT. OF INEVITABILITY</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6164</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6164' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;You don’t say: the Fed’s making money on its Maiden Lane portfolios. . . .  &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>PAULSON ON THE GSE'S: MEND 'EM, DON'T END 'EM</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6163</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6163' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Most noteworthy paragraph in Hank Paulson's op-ed, in today’s Washington Post, on what should be done with the GSEs:

The GSEs are providing
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>HOW DO YOU MAKE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S MOST INCOMPETENT REGULATOR EVEN BETTER?</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6162</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6162' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Dodd-Frank surprise of the day: The S.E.C. is given some exemptions from Freedom of Information Act requests. . . .
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>BUT WE TRIED THIS ONCE. IT DIDN'T WORK.</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6161</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6161' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;In Phoenix, Freddie Mac moves to clear some inventory: 


FREDDIE MAC TO AUCTION OFF FORECLOSED PHOENIX HOUSES



Prospective buyers trying to purchase Phoenix foreclosed homes to live in will have first dibs on 135 houses that mortgage giant Freddie Mac 
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>ALSO, GOLF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS. HE LOVES GOLF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6160</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6160' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Corporate executives don’t trust President Obama. Fareed Zakaria counts the ways why: 

Most of the business leaders I spoke to had voted for Barack Obama. They still admire him. Those who had met him thought he was 
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>THIS IS ONE OF TIMES WHEN VIKRAM PANDIT WOULD RATHER BE LUCKY THAN GOOD</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6159</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6159' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Who knew? It turns out Citi timed its Phibro sale pretty darn well:


[D]id Citi sell Phibro, its famed, profit-making commodity’s trading unit, in the nick of time?


Consider today’s release of second
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>THE MORE HE TALKS, THE FARTHER DOWN HE SINKS</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6158</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6158' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;In Gallup’s survey of Americans’ confidence in the country’s major institutions, out last week, which institution fell by the most? The presidency. In 2009, 51% of Americans said they had a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in it. Now just 36% do—down 15 points.  That is by far the biggest decline of any of the 16 institutions included in the survey. (Next biggest decline: &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>IT TURNS OUT ELIZABETH WARREN'S BAD FAITH EXTENDED TO THE HEALTH CARE DEBATE, TOO</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6155</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6155' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;One more reason to expect that, should she be appointed head of the CFPB, Elizabeth Warren would be less a disinterested regulator than she would be a nakedly partisan hack: she’s been known to obfuscate the data in studies she conducts, in order to arrive at a pre-determined, politically correct conclusion. That’s what happened last year, at any rate, when,&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>AND WHO WANTS TO SPEND A DAY IN D.C. IN JULY IN THE FIRST PLACE?</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6154</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6154' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Oh, that classy White House. An unnamed Wall Street executive tells CNBC how the Obama administration must have decided to dole out the invites to today’s bill signing. &lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>REMINDER: REGULATORS PUT THEIR PANTS ON ONE LEG AT A TIME JUST LIKE THE REST OF US</title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6153</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6153' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Edward Glaeser makes the perfectly obvious, and often forgotten point that regulators are mere mortals, too, and so can be just as non-rational as the consumers they are supposed to protect.  

&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item><item><title>REPORT: THE SELL-SIDE IS AS BAD AT PREDICTING EARNINGS AS EVERYBODY SUSPECTED </title><link>http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6152</link><description>&lt;a href='http://www.bankstocks.com/AddComment.aspx?ArticleID=6152' style='text-decoration: none;'&gt;Duh! Sell-side analysts are chronically over-optimistic: 

Research published by McKinsey &amp; Company this morning lays out in black and white what many have long suspected – that equity
&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:00:00</pubDate><category>Quick Takes</category></item></channel></rss>