If the market doesn’t cnoifrm the pattern I’m looking for, then I look to re-evaluate. There’s some evidence (24 years and 11,000 Dow points, *3400%* in the NDX) that RP’s original assumptions are off. I think it’s wise to have an open mind to an alternate scenario. The logical alternative is that we’ve had a series of 1-2 s rather than 3-4 s. How else do you explain the best Elliott Wave analyst in the world circa 1987 being so far off?