My only disagreement with yesterday’s Wall Street Journal’s editorial blasting proxy advisors is that the paper doesn’t go far enough in denouncing what an abysmal racket the proxy advisory business is in the first place. And it is a racket. The whole rationale for proxy advisors, recall, is that money managers can at times have conflicts of interest in deciding how to vote corporate proxies. On the one hand, they are duty-bound to vote on behalf of their investors’ interest; on the other, managers may have other business relationships with the company in question they don’t want to risk disrupting. Independent advisors like Glass Lewis and ISS, the thinking goes, provide “independent” recommendations that help ensure managers vote the right way.
Baloney. First off, as the Journal points out, advisors have their own conflicts of interest to consider, which can often be much more glaring than anything the typical mutual fund manager has to worry about. (ISS sells governance consulting services to some public companies, for instance.)
But more to the point, the simple fact is that commercial life is full of conflicts of interest-most of which, truth be told, are much more critical than what might arise in the process of proxy voting. Trust me on this. I’ve voted hundreds of proxies on behalf of my investors over the years and, in the vast majority of cases, there’s simply no conflict of interest I’ve had to worry about. (Compare that with the various interests-between investors and customers, say-a company has to balance when it goes through the basic process of pricing a product. Where are the independent pricing advisors there?) In the end, I do what I think is best for my investors. I suspect that’s what most money managers do.
Which gets me to the real point about why the proxy advisory scam is such an abomination. When an investor hires a money manager, what he’s hiring above all is the manager’s integrity and independence of judgment. That, at bottom, is the source of superior investment returns. If you don’t trust a manager to look after your interest in proxy voting, then by all means don’t give him your money in the first place. Maintaining the integrity of corporate democracy would be the least of your worries.
Besides, any notion that there is a right and a wrong answer to most of the questions put before shareholders is ludicrous. On most issues, reasonable people can disagree, notwithstanding what proxy advisors might have to say. Investors should pick managers they believe are honest and capable-and then trust them to do the right thing.
What do you think? Let me know!
5 Responses to “Proxy-Advisory Nonsense”
I’ve had great experiences with dnidtxrafang. They have great customer support and a product that really works! I highly recommend using this to start your own trading business. You can keep your day job but still have an entire trading business that you run at the same time! You don’t need hardly any startup capital at all because you can open a trading account with as little as 100 bucks. I started with $ 1000 and my account is at over $ 15000 already in less than a year! Was this answer helpful?
“When an investor hires a money manager, what he’s hiring above all is the manager’s integrity and independence of judgment.” Agreed, though i’d like to see you guys fight a bit against the egregious pay packages handed out by, why, peers in the same class who think they’re also worth the sums. Now that’s a conflict of interest i’d really like to see eliminated. If you thought the worker unions took advantage, to put it lightly, of their power when they had it, and on that you’d have no beef from me, what about these guys today? Power corrupts, absolute… As for your fight against proxy advisors, what are you trying to do, increase unemployment by ridding the system of unnecessary excesses? Are you un-American? If you are then so am i.
You raise a lot of great points, including potential conflicts, whether managers should “outsource” votes, whether advisory firms have a reliable process in place for developing recommendations, etc. In the end, the most important question is whether their recommendations are “correct.” Ie, are their guidelines consistent with improved future outcomes? For better or worse, proxy advisory firms have created a position of responsibility for themselves and I think all sides of the table want to see that they exercise sound judgment.
This website is for trerdas who do not just want a daily option trading signal, but who truly want to learn how to trade a stock index, such as the S P100 (OEX).Trading the S P100 (OEX) is much like trading the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), e-mini futures, the S P 500 (SPX/SPY) , and the NASDAQ (QQQQ) This is a cash derivative stock index that provides an excellent option trading benchmark, and is great for day trading.Our service provides a complete 130-page manual which I have written about the OEX. The service also provides a daily pre-market alert that identifies 8 key areas to successfully DAY TRADING options.
Comments are closed.